Amazing Race Recap: Leg 5

// October 31st, 2010 // fun

I’m super sorry for not being diligent about updating these recaps…life is busy right now with a lot of things and I just haven’t had time to do stuff like this. However, I am STILL tracking it all and keeping the scores update, so here are the latest standings.

And I have to say…I was happy to post these…Jina and I have vaulted up to the top of the list mostly because of Nat and Kat getting 1st place two weeks in a row and then a Fast Forward last week.

I’m sure they’ll flame out next week, but it’s fun while it lasts.

Last Week’s Standings

  1. Matt 40
  2. Adrian 37
  3. Nicky 33
  4. MJ 31
  5. Kathy 31
  6. Jina 29
  7. Mike 29
  8. Seth/Lisa 24
  9. Ryann 24
  10. Josie 22
  11. Jessica 22
  12. Dave 22
  13. Heather 20
  14. Tracy 13

Current Standings

  1. Jina 58
  2. Mike 58
  3. MJ 55
  4. Seth/Lisa 50
  5. Josie 50
  6. Ryann 50
  7. Jessica 50
  8. Dave 50
  9. Heather 49
  10. Matt 47
  11. Adrian 42
  12. Nicky 33
  13. Kathy 32
  14. Tracy 17

Below is the list of picks from the start of the season:

Player Nat/Kat Brooke/Claire Katie/Rachel Jon/Connor Chad/Steph Jill/Thomas Nick/Vicky Gary/Mallory Michael/Kevin Tie
Jina X X X 6
Nicky X X X 3
Seth/Lisa X X X 7
Josie X X X 3
Tracy X X X 5
Ryann X X X 4
Jessica X X X 5
Matt X X X 7
MJ X X X 3
Kathy X X X 4
Heather X X X 4
Mike X X X 7
Adrian X X X 5
Dave X X X 4

3 Responses to “Amazing Race Recap: Leg 5”

  1. nicky says:

    it was the suckiest of sucky suck weeks for me! two teams gone in a row. oh well, my life at the top was fun while it lasted! now i have no chance of winning :( and i was really sad about the glee boys. i loved them.

  2. jina says:

    so excited that i am at the top. fingers crossed my teams don’t do anything stupid. and for all of you in the rankings below me, don’t worry i won’t rub your faces in it. i know how it feels to try and try and then end up mostly sucking. ;)

  3. Medo says:

    Totally amazing the look you achveied in so little time! Quick question: I understand that bodybuilding has a lot to do with creating the illusion of big muscles by favoring symmetry and increasing definition (and therefore lowering fat) but you can’t obviously show up what you don’t have in the first place (i.e. muscles). Is the amazing definition on your latest pics a result of very low body fat or did you really gain that much muscle mass? (Probably a combination of both but your arms looks definitely bigger whereas your chest don’t seems to have the same growth ratio as your arms no offense intended! My opinion is based purely on a single standing pose. Maybe some side chest pics before/after would prove me wrong)

Leave a Reply